Decision 64/12

The Executive Committee decided:

1. To note:
   1. The evaluation of the implementing agencies’ performance against their 2010 business plans, as contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/64/15;
   2. The quantitative assessment of the performance of the implementing agencies for 2010 on a scale of 100 as follows: UNDP (74), UNEP (72), UNIDO (95), and the World Bank (76); and
2. To request:
   1. Germany to hold an open and constructive discussion with the National Ozone Unit (NOU) in Lesotho about the areas where Germany’s services were perceived to be“less satisfactory” and to report to the 65^th meeting on the results of its consultations with the country on the implementation matters raised in the qualitative performance assessment of the implementing agencies by the country;
   2. UNDP to hold an open and constructive discussion with the NOUs in Argentina, Togo, and Trinidad and Tobago about the areas where UNDP’s services were perceived to be“less satisfactory” and“unsatisfactory” and to report to the 65^th meeting on the results of its consultations with those countries on the implementation matters raised in the qualitative performance assessments of the implementing agencies by the respective countries;
   3. UNEP to hold an open and constructive discussion with the NOUs in Lesotho and Swaziland about the areas where UNEP’s services were perceived to be“less satisfactory” and to report to the 65^th meeting on the results of its consultations with those countries on the implementation matters raised in the qualitative performance assessments of the implementing agencies by the respective countries; and
   4. UNIDO to hold an open and constructive discussion with the NOU in Senegal about the areas where UNIDO’s services were perceived to be“less satisfactory” and to report to the 65^th meeting on the results of its consultations with the country on the implementation matters raised in the qualitative performance assessment of the implementing agencies by the country.