Decision 75/16

The Executive Committee decided:

1. To note:
   1. The evaluation of the implementing agencies’ performance against their 2014 business plans as contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/75/18;
   2. That all implementing agencies had a quantitative assessment of their performance for 2014 of at least 70 on a scale of 100;
   3. That trend analysis indicated that performance had not improved in 2014 in relation to 2013, but that the performance related to indicators such as “ODS to be phased out”, “ODS phased out”, “net emissions due to delays” and “funds disbursed for non‑investment projects” might be improved by careful targeting in the future;
2. To request the following implementing agencies to report to the 76^th meeting on their open and constructive discussions with the national ozone unit (NOU) concerned:
   1. UNDP, regarding the ratings in the qualitative performance assessment given by Belize with respect to timely delivery of services;
   2. UNEP, regarding the ratings in the qualitative performance assessment given by the Central African Republic with respect to the use of training funds, acquisition of equipment, meeting stakeholder expectations, training or technical advice, and quality and design of training projects, and by Panama with respect to NOU involvement in project development and implementation, meeting stakeholder expectations and advice on technical difficulties; and
   3. UNIDO, regarding the ratings in the qualitative performance assessment given by Egypt with respect to timely delivery and responsiveness to the NOU, by Iraq with respect to unsatisfactory ratings for all categories, and by Sierra Leone with respect to work plan explanation and NOU involvement in project identification, development and implementation.