The Executive Committee decided:
- To note:
- The evaluation of the performance of implementing agencies against their 2022 business plans and the revised set of performance indicators for the implementing agencies, as contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/93/9;
- That all implementing agencies had a quantitative assessment of their performance for 2022 of at least 86 on a scale of 100;
- That trend analysis indicated that the performance of implementing agencies had not improved for some indicators in 2022 compared with 2021;
- That quantitative performance in 2022 had improved for two implementing agencies (UNIDO and the World Bank) compared with 2021;
- With appreciation, the efforts undertaken by bilateral and implementing agencies to have open and constructive discussions with the respective national ozone units (NOUs) about the areas in which their services were perceived to be less than satisfactory and that the outcome of their consultations with the NOUs concerned had also been satisfactory;
- To request UNDP to have open and constructive discussions with the NOU of the Dominican Republic to resolve any issues raised in the evaluation of the performance of UNDP and to report to the 94th meeting on the outcome of the discussions;
- To encourage NOUs to submit, on a yearly basis and in a timely manner, their assessments of the qualitative performance of the bilateral and implementing agencies assisting their governments, noting that 80 out of the 144 countries had submitted such assessments for 2022, compared with 75 in 2021; and
- To modify the performance indicators established in decision 71/28, as follows, noting that the new performance indicators would apply as of the 2025–2027 business plans:
| Type of indicator | Short title | Calculation | Weighting |
| Planning-Approval | Tranches approved | Number of tranches approved vs. those planned* | 10 |
| Planning-Approval | Individual projects/activities approved | Number of projects/activities approved vs. those planned (including project preparation activities) | 10 |
| Planning-Approval | Subtotal | 20 | |
| Implementation | Funds disbursed | Based on estimated disbursement in progress reports | 15 |
| Implementation | ODS phase-out for HCFC-related projects | ODS phase-out for HCFC-related projects in ODP tonnes vs. those planned per progress reports | 10 |
| Implementation | HFC phase-down for HFC-related projects | HFC phase-down for HFC-related projects in CO2-eq tonnes vs. those planned per progress reports | 10 |
| Implementation | Project operational completion | Project operational completion vs. planned in progress reports for all activities (excluding project preparation)** | 15 |
| Implementation | Gender mainstreaming | Operational policy on gender mainstreaming applied to all approved projects | 10 |
| Implementation | Subtotal | 60 | |
| Administrative | Speed of financial completion | The extent to which projects are financially completed within 12 months after project operational completion | 10 |
| Administrative | Timely submission of project completion reports | Timely submission of project completion reports based on the progress report | 5 |
| Administrative | Timely submission of progress reports and business plans | Timely submission of progress reports and business plans and responses unless otherwise agreed | 5 |
| Administrative | Subtotal | 20 | |
| Total | 100 |